New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez Assails Romney’s Immigration Views
 

By Elizabeth Llorente

New Mexico Gov. Susana Martínez, mentioned on occasion as a possible running mate for presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, is mincing no words in voicing her opinion of his immigration views.

In an interview with Newsweek, Martínez was unusually outspoken on immigration, in particular about Romney’s support of enforcement policies that would make undocumented immigrants so miserable that they will opt for self-deportation.

“‘Self-deport?’ What the heck does that mean?” she was quoted as saying in the story, which described her as snapping her answer. “I have no doubt Hispanics have been alienated during this campaign. But now there’s an opportunity for Gov. Romney to have a sincere conversation about what we can do and why.”

 

Immigration: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics
 

Matt Mayer

The Obama Administration has claimed that the southern border is secure because apprehension rates for illegal border crossings are down.

The Pew Hispanic Center, using data supplied by the Obama Administration, bolstered this claim by issuing a report that found that illegal border crossings are down and large numbers of illegal immigrants are returning to Mexico.
At least that is what they say the data says.

According to those men and women whose job it is to secure the border, however, the Obama Administration’s statistics are misleading. Border patrol and immigration enforcement employees interviewed by the Washington Times said that

[S]ecurity is being compromised as the government seeks to keep a lid on the border as a campaign issue during the presidential election cycle. Department of Homeland Security’s Border Patrol agents and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers are being told not to make arrests of noncriminal illegal immigrants, and not to patrol areas of high traffic along the roughly 2,000-mile Southwest border.

A Border Patrol official working along the Texas border said administration officials are deliberately failing to document what is actually happening on the border. “In many cases my supervisors make it clear that they don’t want increased apprehension numbers, which means no arrests,” he said.

The government is also failing to patrol hundreds of miles of federal wildlife reserves that fall under the jurisdiction of the Interior Department. That has given smugglers and illegal immigrants a clear corridor to enter the county and has skewed national arrest figures, an official said. The U.S. is allowing “drug and human smugglers in without a fight” in parts of the Southwest, he said.

Ironically, by not securing the border and making apprehensions, the Obama Administration can claim that the number of illegal border crossing is down because of their efforts to secure the border.

One illegal immigrant is quoted as saying that “few, if any, of her Baltimore neighbors in a community consisting largely of illegal immigrants have fled back to their homeland.” As further proof that illegal immigrants aren’t leaving America, “Statistics from the Bank of Mexico, that country’s largest bank, showed that remittances totaled $3.29 billion in January and February, up 7.9 percent over the same period last year. Remittances to Mexico are on a pace to total about $19.7 billion this year, according to the recent reports.”

This ostrich approach to border security is bad policy and puts Americans at risk, as it just might not be illegal migrant workers and drug couriers running through that clear corridor.

 

Some see Hugo Diaz case as referendum on national immigration issue
 

By Kyle Martin
Staff Writer

From the beginning, the Hugo Diaz case has served as a referendum on national immigration issues. Tuesday’s sentence hearing in federal court was no exception.

The Evans-based homebuilder was sentenced to 15 months in federal prison for harboring illegal aliens after an hour-long hearing that included a reading of the poem inscribed at the base of the Statue of Liberty and a condemnation of hiring practices that hurt American businesses.

“This case reveals to all of us the difficulties we face as a nation with the issue of immigration,” U.S. District Judge Randal Hall said.

 


Minority infants now in majority, U.S. census data show

The latest estimates reflect an immigration wave that began four decades ago. The transformation of the country’s racial and ethnic makeup has gathered steam as the white population grows older.

By Carol Morello
The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — For the first time in U.S. history, most of the nation’s babies are members of minority groups, according to new census figures that signal the dawn of an era in which whites no longer will be in the majority.

Population estimates show that 50.4 percent of children younger than 1 last year were Hispanic, black, Asian or other minorities. That’s almost a full percentage point higher than the 49.5 percent of minority babies counted when the decennial census was taken in April 2010. Census demographers said the tipping point came three months later, in July.

 

Court to review request of illegal immigrant to practice law
 

A paralegal who was brought to the United States as a young child has been certified by the State Bar of California, raising broader questions about licensing illegal immigrants in other professions.

By Maura Dolan,
Los Angeles Times

California’s agency that licenses lawyers wants to admit an illegal immigrant to practice law, an unprecedented request that the state’s highest court decided Wednesday to review.

The State Bar of California certified Sergio C. Garcia after he passed a written test and a moral examination, sending it to the California Supreme Court for routine approval. The bar informed the court at the time that Garcia was undocumented.

In a unanimous decision, the state high court ordered the bar to explain why an illegal immigrant should be given a legal license and invited briefs from other parties, opening the door to a potentially heated debate over national immigration policy.

Would the issuance of a license imply that Garcia could be legally employed as an attorney? the court asked. What are the legal and public policy limitations, if any, on an illegal immigrant’s ability to be a lawyer? May other state agencies that license professionals also admit undocumented immigrants?

 

Report spotlights refugees of Mexico’s drug war
 

Ildefonso Ortiz

Apprehension gripped Carlos Acosta as he crossed the Hidalgo international bridge into Reynosa.

Just a few years ago, he wouldn’t have sweated the trip: a few quick errands in a midsize sedan.

But rising border violence has changed the picture. Today Acosta makes these trips less often — and only during the day.

It was the volatility of the drug war in northern Mexico that led Acosta, who was born and raised in the coastal city of Tampico, Tamps., to move his family to the United States in 2010. They had been targeted by kidnapping threats. One attempted abduction was foiled by the Mexican military.

“It just became too much,” he said in Spanish. “It got to the point where not only did you have regular shootouts, but every week you found out someone you knew had been picked up and his family had to pay ransom money, or someone else had been extorted.

“That’s not the way an honest family should live.”

 

Leahy wants investigation into Arizona sheriff’s tactics
 

By Jerry Seper

The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee wants Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to investigate whether the office of Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio used federal grant money to illegally detain Hispanics, whom the government alleges were the victims of racial profiling.

If so, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, wants the Justice Department to consider ways of getting the money back – a total that could exceed $25 million.

 

Harry Reid on Univision: Promises More Obama Amnesty Moves; Bashes Sheriff Joe
 

by John Hill

Harry Reid was in full pander mode in his Unvision interview with anchor (and noted amnesty for illegals advocate) Jorge Ramos.

Ramos first confronted Reid about Obama’s failure to keep his campaign promise to push for an amnesty bill in his first term, despite his 14 months of Congressional filibuster-proof super-majority in 2009-10.

An irritated Reid responded as we would expect him to: by blaming Republicans, even though the GOP could not have stopped any bill in Obama’s first term, if Obama had actually made it a priority (which he did not).

But then Reid made news by revealing that Obama – who has already dismantled the enforcement regime against illegal aliens, and granted a unilateral amnesty for nearly 2 million illegal aliens by a stroke of his pen last August – would be engaging in more amnesty moves without Congressional approval in the near future:

 


Woman admits running immigrant stash house
 

By Guillermo Contreras

A woman pleaded guilty Wednesday to running an immigrant stash house on the South Side while prosecutors dismissed charges against a co-defendant.

Mirta Pellicier Colon, 43, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to harbor immigrants and faces up to 10 years in prison when Chief U.S. District Judge Fred Biery sentences her later this year.

Also charged in the case was Julio Cesar Curiel-Segura, 31, who was among 20 people at the home at 4359 Commercial St. But earlier this week, prosecutors dismissed charges against Curiel-Segura after running into evidentiary issues with him.

 

Immigrant group opposes photo ID proposal
 

AALLIE SHAH

Hoping to build opposition to the proposal to require Minnesota voters to show an approved photo ID, a group of African leaders in the Twin Cities northwest suburbs held the first in a series of meetings Tuesday night.

The forum, which drew about 50 people, was held at the Brooklyn Park City Hall and organized by the African Immigrant Services, Think Again Minnesota, the League of Women Voters, and TakeAction Minnesota.

“We want to provoke a conversation. We want to start here,” said Abdullah Kiatamba, executive director of African Immigrant Services.

He said Tuesday’s meeting will be followed soon by another meeting with local Latinos, Asians and other minority groups who could face barriers to voting should the ID proposal pass.

Last month, the Minnesota Legislature voted to approve a constitutional amendment proposal on this fall’s ballot that would require voters to show a photo ID, create a new system of “provisional balloting” and end election day “vouching” for voters without proof of residence.

 

ROBBINS: Leftists hijack the Founding Fathers
 

Tinkering with Senate rules won’t make legislation better

By James S. Robbins

Liberals are invoking the framers of the Constitution in their latest attempt to employ judges to subvert the institutions of government. At issue is the Senate’s cloture rule, the requirement for three-fifths of voting members to vote to end debate and vote on a bill. Supporters of the Dream Act, which passed the House but couldn’t get to cloture in the Senate, are suing to have the practice overturned as an unconstitutional imposition on majority rule.

The argument in Common Cause et al. v. Joseph Biden et al. centers on essays by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison in the Federalist Papers that opposed requirements for supermajority votes in the legislature. The six exceptions – which include ratifying treaties, impeachment, expulsion from the legislature and amending the Constitution – are by this logic the only intended examples of permitted supermajority voting. Cloture imposes a de facto supermajority requirement and, in the words of Hamilton, substitutes “the pleasure, caprice or artifices of an insignificant, turbulent or corrupt junta, to the regular deliberations and decisions of a respectable majority.”

It’s tricky business invoking the framers, especially for liberals, who have to face a mass of contradictions. After all, they usually argue the Constitution is infinitely flexible and never intended to be a captive of the “dead hand of history.” Suddenly discussing original intent when it is convenient comes across as hypocritical.

 

The War Next Door
 

by Newt Gingrich

Every single day, atrocities take place just south of our border in Mexico that are nearly unimaginable in the United States. The results of drug-related violence in our most populous neighbor are truly horrific: just this week, 49 mutilated and decapitated bodies were found in a city just 80 miles from the United States. In May alone, the Christian Science Monitor reports that 23 bodies have been found “either strewn or hanging off bridges and underpasses” in Nuevo Laredo, just across the Rio Grande from Laredo, Texas.

Americans may not realize the extraordinary level of violence in our most populous neighbor, but we should all be aware of it. Since 2006, 47,000 people have died in violence connected to Mexico’s out-of-control drug cartels.

Americans have a deep interest in helping the government of Mexico establish safety for all its citizens. We owe it to the people of Mexico to do everything we can to help their government defeat the drug cartels.

Below is a list compiled by Stratfor (available here) of drug-related violence in Mexico during the first week of May. It doesn’t even include this week’s discovery of 49 more victims—but consider these recent events and ask yourself what we would be demanding of our government if this was happening here in the United States.

 

 


 

Libertarian for Open Borders
 

By James R. Edwards Jr.

Sometimes you just have to let those who disagree with you on an issue like immigration argue themselves to extremes. That’s what a recent piece in the Huffington Post does.

This item by an open-borders libertarian tries to justify amnesty. He embraces amnesty. He seems to view America as nothing more than a “market”, a body economic, a place where a bunch of disparate people happen to live near one another.

You have to read the essay for yourself to get the full thrust of its surreal, utopian flavor. But let me make one observation.